|
Joseph
Francis Alward
|
The Genesis writer tells the story of Laban’s agreement
to give Jacob all light-streaked goats and dark-streaked lambs born while the
flocks were in Jacob's care. To
increase the birth rate of streaked animals, Jacob made white stripes on brown
tree branches by peeling away dark strips of bark to expose the blond wood
underneath, and put these branches in the animals’ drinking troughs, where they
came to drink when they were in heat.
When the animals mated after drinking the water and looking at the
branches, they bore young that were streaked; the normally brown goats were
streaked white, and the normally white lambs were streaked brown. How could it have been that this wondrous
secret of genetics was known three thousand years ago to the goat herder Jacob,
while it remains unknown even today?
It’s hard to believe that this story can actually be
found in the Bible, but it can. Here it
is:
Jacob, however, took
fresh-cut branches from poplar, almond and plane trees and made white stripes
on them by peeling the bark and exposing the white inner wood of the
branches. Then he placed the peeled
branches in all the watering troughs, so that they would be directly in front
of the flocks when they came to drink. When the flocks were in heat and came to
drink, they mated in front of the branches. And they bore young that were
streaked or speckled or spotted. Genesis 30:37-39
We cannot prove that this did not happen, of course,
but who would ever believe it? But, if it’s
true that streaked goats and lambs were born, it certainly couldn’t have
happened because their parents were looking at streaked tree branches as they
mated. The editors of the New American
Bible seem to be admitting that.
Here’s what they say in a footnote:
Jacob's stratagem was based
on the widespread notion among simple people that visual stimuli can have
prenatal effects on the offspring of breeding animals.
The Genesis writer’s explanation of the birth of
streaked goats and lambs may have made perfect sense to him, for he could not
have known anything about the science of genetics. However, if the writer was inspired by a god to record and
explain this event, that god evidently either didn’t understand genetics, or
else it didn’t care whether generations of Bible readers would have a childish
notion of pre-natal influences. Either
way, the Bible contains blatantly false teaching.
See also, Jacob's
Branches.